Occupational and Functional Outcomes following Patellofemoral Arthroplasty in U.S. Military Servicemembers

Abstract

The functional outcomes in patients undergoing patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) with high occupational demands have not been fully examined. This study assessed return to work and conversion to TKA rates following PFA in a young, military cohort. Patient demographics, pain scores, and surgical information were retrospectively collected for all active-duty military members who underwent PFA over a 4-year period. The data were then analyzed to calculate return to work, conversion to TKA, and perioperative complications rates. A total of 48 servicemembers with 60 total PFAs (36 unilateral, 12 bilateral) were included, with a mean follow up of 2.2 years. At the final follow-up, 83% of servicemembers returned to military service or completed their service obligation after PFA. Conversion to TKA occurred in three (6.2%) patients at an average of 2.4 years after PFA, resulting in a PFA annual revision rate of 2.3%. The mean numeric rating scale for pain improved from 4.9 ± 2.6 at baseline to 2.5 ± 2.0 postoperatively (p < 0.001). Servicemembers with at least one prior ipsilateral knee procedure had a significantly decreased odds ratio (OR) for both occupational outcome failure (OR, 0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0–0.29) and overall failure (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02–0.78). At an average of 2 years following PFA, 83% of military members returned to duty, with a low rate of revision to TKA. Prior ipsilateral knee procedure decreased the probability of medical separation.

Level of Evidence IV

Keywords

patellofemoral arthroplasty - military - functional outcome - physical activity

Publication History

Received: 27 July 2022

Accepted: 16 December 2022

Article published online:
31 January 2023

• References

• 1 Duncan RC, Hay EM, Saklatvala J, Croft PR. Prevalence of radiographic osteoarthritis–it all depends on your point of view. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006; 45 (06) 757-760
• 2 Stefanik JJ, Niu J, Gross KD, Roemer FW, Guermazi A, Felson DT. Using magnetic resonance imaging to determine the compartmental prevalence of knee joint structural damage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013; 21 (05) 695-699
• 3 Duncan R, Peat G, Thomas E, Wood L, Hay E, Croft P. How do pain and function vary with compartmental distribution and severity of radiographic knee osteoarthritis?. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2008; 47 (11) 1704-1707
• 4 Kornaat PR, Bloem JL, Ceulemans RY. et al. Osteoarthritis of the knee: association between clinical features and MR imaging findings. Radiology 2006; 239 (03) 811-817
• 5 Duncan R, Peat G, Thomas E, Wood L, Hay E, Croft P. Does isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis matter?. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009; 17 (09) 1151-1155
• 6 Sandmark H, Vingård E. Sports and risk for severe osteoarthrosis of the knee. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1999; 9 (05) 279-284
• 7 Wang Y, Simpson JA, Wluka AE. et al. Is physical activity a risk factor for primary knee or hip replacement due to osteoarthritis? A prospective cohort study. J Rheumatol 2011; 38 (02) 350-357
• 8 Cameron KL, Hsiao MS, Owens BD, Burks R, Svoboda SJ. Incidence of physician-diagnosed osteoarthritis among active duty United States military service members. Arthritis Rheum 2011; 63 (10) 2974-2982
• 9 Cross JD, Ficke JR, Hsu JR, Masini BD, Wenke JC. Battlefield orthopaedic injuries cause the majority of long-term disabilities. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011; 19 (Suppl. 01) S1-S7
• 10 Patzkowski JC, Rivera JC, Ficke JR, Wenke JC. The changing face of disability in the US Army: the Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom effect. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2012; 20 (Suppl. 01) S23-S30
• 11 Schoenfeld AJ, Goodman GP, Burks R, Black MA, Nelson JH, Belmont Jr PJ. The influence of musculoskeletal conditions, behavioral health diagnoses, and demographic factors on injury-related outcome in a high-demand population. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96 (13) e106
• 12 Army Regulation 40–501: Standards of Medical Fitness. Washington, DC: Department of the Army; 2011
• 13 Air Force Instruction 48–123: Aerospace Medicine Medical Examination and Standards. Washington, DC: Department of the Air Force; 2009
• 14 Medical examinations. In: Manual of the Medical Department (MANMED), NAVMED P-117. Washington, DC: Department of the Navy; 2014
• 15 Quilty B, Tucker M, Campbell R, Dieppe P. Physiotherapy, including quadriceps exercises and patellar taping, for knee osteoarthritis with predominant patello-femoral joint involvement: randomized controlled trial. J Rheumatol 2003; 30 (06) 1311-1317
• 16 Richmond J, Hunter D, Irrgang J. et al; American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee (nonarthroplasty). J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2009; 17 (09) 591-600
• 17 van Jonbergen HP, Poolman RW, van Kampen A. Isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Acta Orthop 2010; 81 (02) 199-205
• 18 Fisher TF, Waterman BR, Orr JD, Holland CA, Bader J, Belmont Jr PJ. Tibial tubercle osteotomy for patellar chondral pathology in an active United States military population. Arthroscopy 2016; 32 (11) 2342-2349
• 19 Klinge SA, Fulkerson JP. Fifteen-year minimum follow-up of anteromedial tibial tubercle transfer for lateral and/or distal patellofemoral arthrosis. Arthroscopy 2019; 35 (07) 2146-2151
• 20 Minas T, Bryant T. The role of autologous chondrocyte implantation in the patellofemoral joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; (436) 30-39
• 21 Spak RT, Teitge RA. Fresh osteochondral allografts for patellofemoral arthritis: long-term followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; (444) 193-200
• 22 Hinckel BB, Pratte EL, Baumann CA. et al. Patellofemoral cartilage restoration: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes. Am J Sports Med 2020; 48 (07) 1756-1772
• 23 Laskin RS, van Steijn M. Total knee replacement for patients with patellofemoral arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; (367) 89-95
• 24 Meding JB, Wing JT, Keating EM, Ritter MA. Total knee arthroplasty for isolated patellofemoral arthritis in younger patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 464 (464) 78-82
• 25 Parvizi J, Stuart MJ, Pagnano MW, Hanssen AD. Total knee arthroplasty in patients with isolated patellofemoral arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; (392) 147-152
• 26 Delanois RE, McGrath MS, Ulrich SD. et al. Results of total knee replacement for isolated patellofemoral arthritis: when not to perform a patellofemoral arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2008; 39 (03) 381-388 , vii
• 27 Leadbetter WB, Ragland PS, Mont MA. The appropriate use of patellofemoral arthroplasty: an analysis of reported indications, contraindications, and failures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; (436) 91-99
• 28 Leadbetter WB, Seyler TM, Ragland PS, Mont MA. Indications, contraindications, and pitfalls of patellofemoral arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (Suppl. 04) 122-137
• 29 Leadbetter WB. Patellofemoral arthroplasty in the treatment of patellofemoral arthritis: rationale and outcomes in younger patients. Orthop Clin North Am 2008; 39 (03) 363-380 , vii
• 30 Dahm DL, Al-Rayashi W, Dajani K, Shah JP, Levy BA, Stuart MJ. Patellofemoral arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty in patients with isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Am J Orthop 2010; 39 (10) 487-491
• 31 Lombardi Jr AV, Nunley RM, Berend KR. et al. Do patients return to work after total knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472 (01) 138-146
• 32 Clyde CT, Goyal N, Matar WY, Witmer D, Restrepo C, Hozack WJ. Workers' Compensation patients after total joint arthroplasty: do they return to work?. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28 (06) 883-887
• 33 Kievit AJ, van Geenen RC, Kuijer PP, Pahlplatz TM, Blankevoort L, Schafroth MU. Total knee arthroplasty and the unforeseen impact on return to work: a cross-sectional multicenter survey. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (06) 1163-1168
• 34 Styron JF, Barsoum WK, Smyth KA, Singer ME. Preoperative predictors of returning to work following primary total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (01) 2-10
• 35 Belmont Jr PJ, Heida K, Keeney JA, Hamilton W, Burks R, Waterman BR. Return to work and functional outcomes following primary total knee arthroplasty in U.S. military servicemembers. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (06) 968-972
• 36 Foote JA, Smith HK, Jonas SC, Greenwood R, Weale AE. Return to work following knee arthroplasty. Knee 2010; 17 (01) 19-22
• 37 Chawla H, Ghomrawi HM, van der List JP, Eggman AA, Zuiderbaan HA, Pearle AD. Establishing age-specific cost-effective annual revision rates for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (01) 326-335
• 38 Dictionary of Occupational Titles. 4th ed., revised. Washington, DC: US Department of Labor, Office of Administrative Law Judges; 1991. Accessed December 7, 2017 at: www.oalj.gov/public/dot/refernces/dotappc.htm
• 39 Emshoff R, Bertram S, Emshoff I. Clinically important difference thresholds of the visual analog scale: a conceptual model for identifying meaningful intraindividual changes for pain intensity. Pain 2011; 152 (10) 2277-2282
• 40 Bijur PE, Latimer CT, Gallagher EJ. Validation of a verbally administered numerical rating scale of acute pain for use in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2003; 10 (04) 390-392
• 41 Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF. et al; European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC). Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage 2011; 41 (06) 1073-1093
• 42 Ferreira-Valente MA, Pais-Ribeiro JL, Jensen MP. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales. Pain 2011; 152 (10) 2399-2404
• 43 Kendrick DB, Strout TD. The minimum clinically significant difference in patient-assigned numeric scores for pain. Am J Emerg Med 2005; 23 (07) 828-832
• 44 Farrar JT, Young Jr JP, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole MR. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 2001; 94 (02) 149-158
• 45 Rowbotham MC. What is a “clinically meaningful” reduction in pain?. Pain 2001; 94 (02) 131-132
• 46 Hubertsson J, Petersson IF, Thorstensson CA, Englund M. Risk of sick leave and disability pension in working-age women and men with knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2013; 72 (03) 401-405
• 47 Li X, Gignac MA, Anis AH. The indirect costs of arthritis resulting from unemployment, reduced performance, and occupational changes while at work. Med Care 2006; 44 (04) 304-310
• 48 Lyall H, Ireland J, El-Zebdeh MY. The effect of total knee replacement on employment in patients under 60 years of age. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2009; 91 (05) 410-413
• 49 Ruiz Jr D, Koenig L, Dall TM. et al. The direct and indirect costs to society of treatment for end-stage knee osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (16) 1473-1480
• 50 Singh JA, Vessely MB, Harmsen WS. et al. A population-based study of trends in the use of total hip and total knee arthroplasty, 1969-2008. Mayo Clin Proc 2010; 85 (10) 898-904
• 51 Daniele DO, Taubman SB, Clark LL. Incidence of joint replacement among active component service members, U.S. Armed Forces, 2004-2014. MSMR 2015; 22 (05) 2-8
• 52 Showery JE, Kusnezov NA, Dunn JC, Bader JO, Belmont Jr PJ, Waterman BR. The rising incidence of degenerative and posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the knee in the United States military. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (10) 2108-2114
• 53 Ackroyd CE, Newman JH, Evans R, Eldridge JDJ, Joslin CC. The Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty: five-year survivorship and functional results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89 (03) 310-315
• 54 Leadbetter WB, Kolisek FR, Levitt RL. et al. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: a multi-centre study with minimum 2-year follow-up. Int Orthop 2009; 33 (06) 1597-1601
• 55 Mohammed R, Jimulia T, Durve K, Bansal M, Green M, Learmonth D. Medium-term results of patellofemoral joint arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg 2008; 74 (04) 472-477
• 56 Kooijman HJ, Driessen AP, van Horn JR. Long-term results of patellofemoral arthroplasty. A report of 56 arthroplasties with 17 years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003; 85 (06) 836-840
• 57 Gupta RR, Zywiel MG, Leadbetter WB, Bonutti P, Mont MA. Scientific evidence for the use of modern patellofemoral arthroplasty. Expert Rev Med Devices 2010; 7 (01) 51-66
• 58 Kuijer PP, Kievit AJ, Pahlplatz TM. et al. Which patients do not return to work after total knee arthroplasty?. Rheumatol Int 2016; 36 (09) 1249-1254
• 59 Bardgett M, Lally J, Malviya A, Deehan D. Return to work after knee replacement: a qualitative study of patient experiences. BMJ Open 2016; 6 (02) e007912
• 60 Malviya A, Wilson G, Kleim B, Kurtz SM, Deehan D. Factors influencing return to work after hip and knee replacement. Occup Med (Lond) 2014; 64 (06) 402-409
• 61 Sankar A, Davis AM, Palaganas MP, Beaton DE, Badley EM, Gignac MA. Return to work and workplace activity limitations following total hip or knee replacement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013; 21 (10) 1485-1493
• 62 Christ AB, Baral E, Koch C, Shubin Stein BE, Gonzalez Della Valle A, Strickland SM. Patellofemoral arthroplasty conversion to total knee arthroplasty: retrieval analysis and clinical correlation. Knee 2017; 24 (05) 1233-1239
• 63 Lewis PL, Tudor F, Lorimer M. et al. Short-term revision risk of patellofemoral arthroplasty is high: an analysis from eight large arthroplasty registries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2020; 478 (06) 1222-1231
• 64 Crawford DA, Adams JB, Lombardi Jr AV, Berend KR. Activity level does not affect survivorship of unicondylar knee arthroplasty at 5-year minimum follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34 (07) 1364-1368
• 65 Walker T, Perkinson B, Mihalko WM. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: the other unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94 (18) 1712-1720
• 66 Argenson JN, Flecher X, Parratte S, Aubaniac JM. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: an update. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 440 (440) 50-53
• 67 Zarkadis NJ, Belmont Jr PJ, Zachilli MA. et al. Autologous chondrocyte implantation and tibial tubercle osteotomy for patellofemoral chondral defects: improved pain relief and occupational outcomes among US Army servicemembers. Am J Sports Med 2018; 46 (13) 3198-3208
• 68 Belmont Jr PJ, Fisher TF, Bader JM, Lanzi JT, Owens BD, Waterman BR. Anteromedializing tibial tubercle osteotomy for patellofemoral instability: occupational and functional outcomes in U.S. military service members. J Knee Surg 2018; 31 (04) 306-313
• 69 Imhoff AB, Feucht MJ, Bartsch E, Cotic M, Pogorzelski J. High patient satisfaction with significant improvement in knee function and pain relief after mid-term follow-up in patients with isolated patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27 (07) 2251-2258
• 70 Farr II J, Barrett D. Optimizing patellofemoral arthroplasty. Knee 2008; 15 (05) 339-347
• 71 Hendrix MR, Ackroyd CE, Lonner JH. Revision patellofemoral arthroplasty: three- to seven-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23 (07) 977-983
• 72 Lonner JH, Jasko JG, Booth Jr RE. Revision of a failed patellofemoral arthroplasty to a total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (11) 2337-2342
• 73 van Jonbergen HPW, Werkman DM, van Kampen A. Conversion of patellofemoral arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: a matched case-control study of 13 patients. Acta Orthop 2009; 80 (01) 62-66
• 74 Lonner JH. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: pros, cons, and design considerations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (428) 158-165
• 75 Lonner JH, Bloomfield MR. The clinical outcome of patellofemoral arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2013; 44 (03) 271-280 , vii
• 76 Feucht MJ, Cotic M, Beitzel K. et al. A matched-pair comparison of inlay and onlay trochlear designs for patellofemoral arthroplasty: no differences in clinical outcome but less progression of osteoarthritis with inlay designs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (09) 2784-2791